Thursday, January 27, 2011

Strong's Exposed

James Strong was born in 1822 and died in 1894. He was a Methodist that believed in infant baptism and the creator of the Strong’s Concordance.

He was a member of the Revised Version committee in 1881. The Revised Version uses the corrupt Westcott and Hort text. Westcott and Hort believed that the Vaticanus and Aleph manuscripts which were Roman Catholic manuscripts were better. These two men were heretics that denied the deity of Christ and along with many more main doctrines.

Strong was also member of the American Standard Version committee. The ASV says the Lord Jesus Christ is a creature, not the Creator in the marginal note for John 9:38 and Matthew 2:2. I could go on and on about how the ASV corrupts doctrines in the word of God, but you get the picture.

Those two committees consisted of Unitarians(deniers of the Trinity and other major doctrines) such as Joseph Henry Thayer; Bible critics such as Samuel Rolles Driver; and even a child molester by the name of Charles John Vaughan.

The definitions of the Strong’s Concordance are often the very words in the RV, ASV and even the Koran.

Most of Strong’s definitions came from Gensenius’ Hebrew lexicon which is corrupt. Also the corrupt lexicons of Thayer, Brown, Briggs, Driver and Liddell-Scott.

Gensenius was called “dangerous” by Christians and his definitions and grammar were taken from the conjecture about usages in pagan nations, not from Hebrew. He believed in Subjective Rationalism which is the belief of man’s own ideas, without spiritual revelation from God. Other Hebrew lexicographers say that his works are unscientific, useless, unsatisfactory, superficial and misleading. He believed that a lexicographer must study mythology in order to understand Hebrew words.

It is important to know that the Strong’s Greek text is not always that which underlies the King James Bible. Also, the later editions of the Strong’s Concordance are being made to match up with the corrupt new versions.

The Greek and Hebrew definitions in the Strong’s Concordance are often not literal renderings of Greek or Hebrew words.

Strong’s Encyclopedia equates Lucifer with Jesus in Isaiah 14:12 by saying the word “Lucifer” means “morning star”. This is impossible because the Hebrew word for “star” is not even used.

His corrupt encyclopedia also says that there is a “happy part in Hades” and that the literal description of a hell with fire is wrong.

Strong calls the corrupt Vatican Manuscript the most valuable MSS of the Greek testament. He also recommends Dr. Geddes who was a Roman Catholic that said the King James Bible falls short of the “true principles of translation”.

In conclusion, the definitions in the Strong’s Concordance along with other corrupt lexicons are not needed and cannot be trusted. The King James Bible defines itself by scripture comparison and reading the context of a passage.